State Damage Caps in Medical Malpractice Cases

State Damage Caps in Medical Malpractice Cases

Medical malpractice cases are complex and often emotionally charged, involving intricate details of medical care, legal principles, and personal harm. One critical aspect of these cases is the issue of damages, or the financial compensation awarded to plaintiffs.

In many states, there are caps – limits set by law – on the amount of damages a plaintiff can receive. These caps can significantly affect the outcome of a case, the compensation received, and the overall justice of the legal process.

When you’re interested in pursuing a medical malpractice claim, do not hesitate to consult with a qualified attorney. A medical malpractice lawyer can explain your rights, options, and damage caps in your state, helping you better understand what you might anticipate from your case.

What is Medical Malpractice?

Doctor holding a card with text Medical Malpractice

Medical malpractice occurs when a healthcare professional, such as a doctor, nurse, or pharmacist, fails to provide the standard level of care expected in their field, resulting in harm to a patient. Medical malpractice can involve:

  • Errors in diagnosis, including misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis
  • Surgical mistakes, like performing surgery on the wrong site or leaving surgical instruments inside a patient
  • Anesthesia errors, such as administering the wrong drugs or too much of an anesthetic
  • Birth injuries, like those resulting from errors in care or wrongful use of tools during delivery
  • Medication mistakes, including prescribing the wrong drug or errors in dosage

For a case to be considered medical malpractice, plaintiffs must typically satisfy the elements of negligence, including:

  • Duty of care: The medical professional owed a duty of care to the patient.
  • Breach of duty: There was a breach of that duty through negligent actions or omissions.
  • Causation: The breach directly caused harm or injury to the patient.
  • Damages: The patient suffered injuries and damages as a result. 

Medical malpractice cases can be complex and require extensive evidence and expert testimony to establish the standard of care and how it was breached. These cases are best handled by experienced medical malpractice attorneys for more favorable results.

Types of Damages in Medical Malpractice Cases

Hand with pen pointing to damages word on the paper

Damages for medical malpractice cases typically fall into different categories, each intended to compensate victims for their losses or address various aspects of harm the victim experiences due to the malpractice.

Compensatory Damages

Compensatory damages, as the name indicates, compensate victims for their malpractice-related injuries, expenses, and losses. They help make the victim “whole” again. Compensatory damages include economic and non-economic damages.

Economic Damages

Economic damages represent the tangible losses a medical malpractice victim suffers. These damages can include:

Because these losses are monetary, they are often easier to prove, as more evidence is usually available.

Non-Economic Damages

Non-economic damages compensate for intangible losses. They can include:

Because these damages are more subjective, they can be a bit more challenging to prove. More evidence and testimony is usually required to establish these losses.

Punitive Damages

Unlike compensatory damages, punitive damages do not compensate victims. Instead, they aim to punish defendants for their particularly egregious behavior while also deterring similar conduct in the future. Not all states allow punitive damages in medical malpractice cases, and if they do, not all cases qualify for them. When they are permissible, they often have strict caps.

Understanding Damage Caps

Award of moral financial compensation for caused damage.

Damage caps limit the amount of compensation a victim might receive in a lawsuit. In the context of medical malpractice cases, these caps usually pertain to non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering and emotional distress. Economic damages, which cover tangible losses like medical expenses and lost income, are typically not subject to these caps.

The primary goals of damage caps in medical malpractice cases are to:

  • Encourage settlement: Caps can facilitate settlements by providing a clearer range of potential compensation, which can help parties negotiate more effectively. 
  • Reduce frivolous lawsuits: Proponents argue that caps discourage non-meritorious claims by reducing the potential financial rewards for such cases.
  • Provide more access to healthcare: Damage caps limit the potential financial risk for healthcare providers and aim to encourage more doctors to practice, especially in high-risk fields and underserved areas.

Additionally, by limiting award amounts, caps can reduce the financial burden on the healthcare system and prevent excessive payouts that can lead to higher insurance premiums. However, they can also leave injured patients with limited financial recovery following life-altering medical malpractice injuries. Every claimant must ensure they receive the maximum amount under the law, given their circumstances.

Types of Damage Caps

Several types of damage caps exist based on state laws, including:

  • Caps on non-economic damages: This limit is specifically for compensation related to pain and suffering, emotional distress, and other intangible losses. For instance, a state might set a cap of $250,000 for non-economic damages.
  • Caps on total damages: This cap includes both economic and non-economic damages. It sets an upper limit on the total compensation a plaintiff can receive for a medical malpractice case. For example, a state may have a cap of $1 million on the total damages awarded.
  • Caps for specific types of damages: Some states have separate caps for different types of damages, such as caps for loss of consortium or punitive damages. 

It’s important to familiarize yourself with your state’s damage caps. This can give you an idea of the compensation you can receive. Your medical malpractice lawyer can provide guidance on the topic.

State Damage Caps for Medical Malpractice Cases

Medical malpractice cases are a type of personal injury case. However, damage caps for medical malpractice cases are more common than those imposed on other types of personal injury cases, like car accidents and slip and falls.

Currently, only 11 states have caps on non-economic damages in personal injury cases: Alaska, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Kansas, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Ohio, Oklahoma, and Tennessee.

However, damage caps for medical malpractice cases are much more common, with over half of U.S. states having caps on non-economic damages. These states include:

  • Alaska
  • California
  • Colorado
  • Hawaii
  • Idaho
  • Indiana
  • Kansas
  • Louisiana
  • Maryland
  • Michigan
  • Mississippi
  • Missouri
  • Montana
  • Nevada
  • New Mexico
  • North Carolina
  • North Dakota
  • Ohio
  • Oklahoma
  • South Carolina
  • South Dakota
  • Texas
  • Utah
  • Virginia
  • West Virginia
  • Wisconsin

Here’s a look at how some states handle damage caps in medical malpractice cases:

  • Virginia: Virginia does impose damage caps for total damages in a unique manner. The cap for total damages is currently at $2.65 million. Every July 1st, the cap increases by $50,000. The cap will continue to increase until 2031 when it will be set at $3 million. 
  • California: Under the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA), California imposes a $250,000 cap on non-economic damages. This cap has been the subject of considerable debate, with proponents arguing that it helps keep healthcare costs manageable and opponents contending that it unfairly limits compensation for severe injuries.
  • New Jersey: Under New Jersey Law, there are no damage caps for economic or non-economic damages for medical malpractice. However, there is a damage cap for punitive damages. No plaintiff can recover greater than five times their compensatory damages or $350,000, whichever is greater.
  • Texas: Texas has a $250,000 cap on non-economic damages against individual healthcare providers and a $500,000 cap on non-economic damages to be recovered by all healthcare institutions involved. This system was established by the 2003 Texas Medical Malpractice Reform Act, which aimed to reduce the frequency and severity of malpractice lawsuits. 

Other states, including Arizona, Connecticut, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont, do not have damage caps on medical malpractice damages.

States Where Medical Malpractice Damage Caps are Unconstitutional 

In nine U.S. states, not only are damage caps for medical malpractice cases not imposed, but they have also been ruled unconstitutional. These states include:

  • Alabama
  • Florida
  • Georgia
  • Kansas
  • Illinois
  • New Hampshire
  • Oklahoma
  • Oregon
  • Washington

These states previously had damage caps but were deemed unconstitutional in specific cases, such as Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Association in Alabama, Atlanta Oculoplastic Surgery, P.S. v. Nestlehutt in Georgia, and Brannigan v. Usitalo in New Hampshire.

Is there an Average Payout for Medical Malpractice Cases?

Average payout in Medical Malpractice case

Often, medical malpractice victims worry about their potential payout. They wonder if there is an “average” payout for medical malpractice cases. In short, the answer is no.

Every medical malpractice case is unique, featuring different details, circumstances, and plaintiffs. While some cases may closely mimic others, no two cases are ever the same. For this reason, it’s nearly impossible to determine an exact average for medical malpractice cases.

Factors Influencing Compensation for a Medical Malpractice Case

To determine how much your medical malpractice case is worth, it’s necessary to assess your case and evaluate certain influential details, including:

  • Severity of injury: The extent and seriousness of the injury or harm caused by the malpractice significantly affects the case’s value. Severe, long-term, or permanent injuries typically result in higher compensation.
  • Impact on quality of life: How the injury has affected your daily life, including your ability to work, perform daily activities, and overall quality of life.
  • Total cost of medical expenses: The total cost of your past and present medical treatment, including hospital stays, medication, and surgeries.
  • Future medical needs: Whether you’ll require ongoing medical care to treat the injuries suffered due to the malpractice.
  • Time off from work: How much time you’ve taken away from work to recover, and whether you can return to work at the same capacity as before your harm.
  • Mental and emotional impacts: How the incident and your physical harm have affected you mentally and emotionally.
  • Jurisdiction: Varying laws on caps on damages can influence the overall value of your case.
  • Insurance coverage: The available insurance coverage from the healthcare provider or facility involved can limit or influence the settlement or award amount. 

Additionally, the strength of your evidence can affect the value of your claim and eventual payout. Strong evidence proving that the standard of care was breached and that the breach directly caused the injury is crucial. This can include medical records, expert testimonies, and diagnostic documentation.

Obtaining fair compensation in medical malpractice cases is essential, as it can help minimize short-term and long-term financial burdens. A knowledgeable medical malpractice attorney can assess your case and calculate your damages to ensure full and fair compensation.

How Damage Caps Affect Plaintiffs

While the imposition of damage caps can be understandable, they can also profoundly impact plaintiffs, including financial and emotional consequences and access to justice.

For those who have suffered severe injuries due to medical negligence, the limitations on non-economic damages may not adequately reflect the full extent of their suffering. If the caps restrict recovery to amounts that do not fully cover the impact of their injuries, this can lead to a sense of injustice and financial hardship.

Damage caps can also influence access to justice. In states with low caps, plaintiffs might find it less worthwhile to pursue legal action, particularly in cases where they feel the potential recovery does not justify the costs and efforts involved. This can result in fewer malpractice suits being filed, potentially leaving some cases unaddressed and reducing accountability for medical practitioners.

If you feel your state’s damage caps can negatively impact your case and future, discuss this with a medical malpractice attorney. An experienced lawyer can give you their perspective and let you know what to expect with your claim.

A Medical Malpractice Attorney Can Help You Get the Most for Your Claim

The impact of medical malpractice damage caps on plaintiffs, healthcare providers, and the legal system is complex and multifaceted, with ongoing debates about their effectiveness and fairness. Still, even if your state imposes damage caps for medical malpractice cases, it’s worth discussing your case with a legal professional to make the most informed decision.

If you or a loved one have been harmed by a medical professional, do not wait to seek legal help. A Virginia personal injury attorney can explain your legal rights and give you insight concerning the future of your case and potential compensation.

William B. Kilduff

Partner

Author's Bio

Related Blog

 

Schedule A Free Case Evaluation

If you have been injured because of someone elses negligence, contact one of our experienced personal injury lawyers for a free consultation. For your convenience, Emroch & Kilduff has two office locations in Virginia: Richmond and Tappahannock.

Contact our offices today online or by calling (804) 358-1568 to schedule a free consultation, discuss the details of your injury, and determine the best path forward given your individual circumstances.

Free Case Consultation

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.